objective and subjective perspective in film

 subjective perspective in film - the audience audience sees events through the leading actor's eyes, as if they were experiencing the events themselves. it shows the influences of the character and emphasises on their own perspective and understanding.

objective filmmaking - makes it look as if the narrator is an outsider or third party who watches the proceedings of the scene in sidelines. doesn't focus on personal feelings, or she any biased influences.

ways that a filmmaker can immerse you into a characters perspective - film camera can act as a bridge between the relationship of the film actors and the film audiences using for e.g: POV shots, sound, soundtrack, movements, closeups, hallucinations and dreams, various angles, vertigo zoom lines, eye line edits, steady cam follows, inserts of characters thoughts, shaky camera

examples - saving private Ryan, Big Fish

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Buster Keaton 'One week' and 'The scarecrow' analysis

One week meaning is created in the frame itself, rather than through editing or cuts editing is extremely minimal, as invisible as possible, only present when completely necessary editing used is all for functional purposes rather than to create meaning; for example the opening shot cuts briefly to a close up of a new character before cutting to another long take of them getting in the car. so used to advance the plot rather than have an effect on how the audience view the events. the framing fits the size of the joke, mostly wide shots to show all the action happening, closest shot is the medium shot towards the end majority of, if not all Keaton's emotions and expressions are expressed through exaggerated body language and movement  size contrast is as a comedic effect - Keatons small stature is used to an advantage vs tall fatty man Keaton uses several silent comedy conventions - stuns, falls, special effects, chase sequences, set design, using mis en scene for jokes breaks 4th...
Read more

NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN: questions to consider

Do you find the ending of the film to be satisfying resolution ?  Why ? it was not a satisfying resolution at all - the audience does not see any conflicts resolved between Llewelyn and Anton How were you expecting the film to end ?   I was expecting there to be an ending fight scene in which either one of them dies and maybe Sheriff Ed Tom Bell gets involved in some way. Also for there to be a triumph on either sides it was quite ambiguous throughout the film as to who would get the money to succeed. Why do you feel the Coen Brothers decided to have their main protagonist killed offscreen , and then avoid a final climax between Sheriff Bell and Chigurh ?  Consider the effect on the audience in terms of expectations of genre and narrative,  and the  themes of  law and order v criminality , good v evil , heroism etc. I think that the reason the Coen Brothers decided to end the film in this way is because they wanted to demonstrate the idea that as peopl...
Read more